J.K. McKee of Messianic Apologetics discusses some of the negative traits of the One Law/One Torah sub-movement, while also offering some positive solutions as many non-Jewish Believers are being legitimately moved by the Lord to follow His Torah.
Messianic Insider
J.K. McKee of Messianic Apologetics discusses some of the most important similarities between the native and sojourner in Ancient Israel.
J.K. McKee of Messianic Apologetics evaluates the contextual usage of terms such as “one law” or “one statute” in Numbers 15:15-16 and 15:29-30.
J.K. McKee of Messianic Apologetics evaluates the different perspectives present in the broad Messianic community regarding Matthew 23:2-3, and the role of the Rabbinic tradition in Torah observance.
J.K. McKee of Messianic Apologetics discusses the challenges of how too many people are stuck using the Strong’s Concordance dictionary for Hebrew and Greek, when there are many other, more useful tools available.
J.K. McKee of Messianic Apologetics responds to three categories of questions: Tanach (OT), Apostolic Scriptures (NT), and theology/Biblical Studies.
1. Does Leviticus 11 only command ethnic Israelites to follow the kosher dietary laws?
2. Yeshua says that only God is good.
3. Are today’s Messianic people “Christians”?
J.K. McKee of Messianic Apologetics provides a lengthy and detailed analysis of Ephesians 2:15: “For He Himself is our peace, who made both groups into one and broke down the barrier of the dividing wall, by abolishing in His flesh the enmity, which is the Law of commandments contained in ordinances, so that in Himself He might make the two into one new man, thus establishing peace” (NASU).
J.K. McKee of Messianic Apologetics evaluates the contextual usage of terms such as “one law” or “one statute” in Leviticus 24:22 and Numbers 9:14.
J.K. McKee of Messianic Apologetics evaluates the contextual usage of terms such as “one law” or “one statute” in Exodus 12:48-49 and Leviticus 7:7.
J.K. McKee of Messianic Apologetics discusses some of the unfortunate controversies and emotionalism that can arise, when the theological issue over “one law” mentioned in the Torah arises. Is it possible for there to be a mature way to approach this issue, which facilitates stability?
